There has been speculation in the media that Eleanor "wasn't sure" if she had been raped, and that she made a report in good faith, in the "genuine belief" that she might have been raped but couldn't remember anything because she was "drugged".
Let me dispell this myth...
Here is an extract from an email she sent to police, in which Eleanor was adamant she has been raped. And says she was locked in my flat until midday.
Here is another email she sent, saying that she was held "captive" and then developed Stockholm syndrome. For context, these emails were sent by Eleanor, months after her initial complaint to the police
And here is an extract from her Police Interview (ABE) on 4th January 2013, which clearly demonstrates the level of detail she was prepared to go into when making up her story.
The contrast between the allegations and the evidence
Eleanor claimed she was violently attacked, crying, fighting back, and held captive until midday. Yet, she sent text messages from my flat, the alleged crime scene, saying she had "huge fun" with me.
When we parted company, she told a colleague that she had "an amazing time with an amazing guy". The colleague gave a witness statement confirming this.
She told police she was locked in my flat until midday, unable to escape, but CCTV showed us at an Ann Summers shop buy sex aids at around 1130am.
Her father David de Freitas, and his associates Harriet Wistrich and Lisa Avalos have access to the all the documents. They know the truth.
But they continue to push the false narrative that Eleanor "couldn’t remember" what happened because "she was drugged and wasn't able to consent". They do this, so they can continue to persuade others, who have not seen the evidence, to join their campaign and keep spreading this false narrative.